Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rebecca Tapley's avatar

There was a related kerfuffle in the game tech community circa 2023, I think? Someone seeking a job at one of the big game designers read the fine print on the application, and found sneaky language about freely giving up their image rights once they clicked Send. The company wanted applicants to give up their likenesses, etc. for widespread use in console games, without receiving compensation or even acknowledgement. I was really upset that this wasn't mentioned on mainstream news. Even if someone isn't creative and thinking about intellectual property protection, shouldn't Americans be discussing the personal security / privacy issues involved with image rights if they're unlocking their devices with facial recognition?

Expand full comment
Chaz's avatar

Thanks Colleen, this is such a barbed issue but something creatives need to be mindful of. Of note, YouTube is a prime example fraught with hypocrisies —by many artists no less. It's evident that most people don't understand the basic principles of why copyrights even exist let alone the differences between it, patents, and trademarks, or how it relates to likenesses, fair use, etc. I've often heard Copy WRITE or copy WRITTEN, and a kitchen utensil is required to pry my eyes loose from the reflexive eyeroll. No sooner do I get them free and a claim to "educational or review purposes" is used to rationalize an infraction that I have to reach for the utensil again.

Expand full comment
30 more comments...

No posts